|
|
|
•The incremental cost-effectiveness scatterplot shows the
results of the 10,000 iterations
|
|
•It shows the incremental costs and effectiveness of the
“coordinator” strategy compared to “no coordinator”
|
|
•Most simulations resulted in the “coordinator” strategy
being more effective and less costly than the “no coordinator” strategy
(results are in the south-east quadrant of the graph).
|
|
•The diagonal line shows a WTP of $25,000 per further hip
fracture avoided. All points (iteration results) below that line are
considered to be cost-effective at this threshold.
|
|
•The probability of the “coordinator” strategy being
cost-effective at different WTP thresholds is high, exceeding 90% at a WTP
threshold of C$10,000 and higher.
|