Notities
Diavoorstelling
Overzicht
1
How to measure outcome
  • J. Mieke Hazes
  • Professor of Rheumatology
  • Erasmus university Medical Center
  • Rotterdam, The Netherlands
2
“The Burden of Musculoskeletal Conditions at the Start of the New Millennium”
3
Why should we measure outcome?
  • To show that our interventions make a difference in the health related quality of life of our patients
  • To show that new interventions are better (more cost-effective) than the established interventions


  • Make studies comparable
  • (randomised controlled trials)
  • At least measure “income”
  • In order to measure changes and to compare studies



4
Quality of Life in the Rheumatic Diseases
  • Typical consequences of the disease for the patient:
    • Pain
    • Loss of function
    • Restricted participation in society
5
Structuring process and outcome
  • Are we measuring the right outcomes ?


    • Mix-up with:
      • Process measures
      • Intervening/intermediate measures
      • Disease centered outcomes
      • Patient centered outcomes
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
ICF- WHO International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health
10
 
11
 
12
Measurement tools: body functions
  • Sensation:
    • Pain
    • Stiffness
    • Fatigue
    • Emotional:depression

  • Muscle strength


  • Condition


  • Mobility/ROM

    • VAS, Likert
    • VAS, time
    • VAS, questionnaire
    • HADS

  • Manual, dynamometer


  • “VO2 max”, heart rate


  • ROM scores


13
Measurement tools: body structure
  • Swelling
  • Damage


  • Form
  • Structure
  • Joint indexes
  • X-joint scores, fracture scores
  • Ligament damage scores (degrees)
  • Degrees deformity, alignment
  • BMD
14
Measurement tools: activity limitations
  • Essential activities


  • Complex activities


  • Discretional
  • (e.g. gardening)


  • Actual measurement
  • (walking time, grip strength)
  • Questionnaires
  • (HAQ, SF36, AIMS…..)
  • Actual measurement, questionnaire
  • (MACTAR)
15
 
16
Measurement tools: participation restriction
  • At individual level




  • At group level
  • (public health)
  • ?
  • (parts of AIMS, SF36)
  • Work loss, sickness pension


  • Accessibility buildings
  • work loss / work disability


17
SF-36 Comparison
Normal vs. RA patients in Europe, US & Mexico
18
Which outcome measures are used in RA Surgery?
  • Harris hip
  • Knee Society
  • Constant Shoulder
  • SFA
  • EFA
  • HSS scores



19
Required properties of measurement tools
  • valid
  • reliable
  • simple
  • available
  • widely used
  • well researched
  • feasible
20
Choice of outcome measurement tools
  • Aim of survey/study
  • Patient relevant measures
  • All domains of ICF
  • Widely used instruments to increase comparability
  • Include generic instrument for policy makers
  • Feasibility & costs
21